Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

April 11th, 2013

4/11/2013

 
Dear Urban,

This is all well and good. But only citizens of a country have the sovereign prerogative to make their own laws and policies, including redistribution policies. For some reason, many of us engaged in the international development
business appear to forget this.  The good news is that the situation is gradually changing.  Citizens of "poor" countries are increasingly re-asserting their sovereignty over their nations’ policies. Like their counterparts in richer countries.  And they are doing so through elections (since political parties are a summary of policy options) and civil actions. To ignore the agency of citizens of poor countries as in the proposal for a Global Social Protection Fund, is a big mistake. 
 
I have not seen any strong and persuasive argument for a global social protection fund.  And there is no reason to assume that citizens of poor countries want it.  In my view, it will be one more avenue through which obnoxious
policies will be imposed on poor countries. And could be, like the Global Fund another avenue for allegations of corruption against countries. Rather than create yet another fund with all the difficulties that its implementation will
raise, efforts should instead be focused on how best to assist countries manage their new found mineral wealth.  Recent advances in mining and drilling technologies have made (or will make) many of Africa's poor countries immensely rich. For these countries, what is required is better contract terms with oil and mining firms and better management of revenues, not yet another “global”
institution that reinforces their constructed status as poor. Through better management of their mineral resources and revenues accruing from them as well as through enhancing regional trade integration, citizens of these countries, rich
and poor alike, will improve their material circumstances.  There is need to temper the urge that sees the creation of new “global” institutions as the panacea to poverty.
 
Kasirim Nwuke,
Chief New Technologies and Innovation Section
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA),  Addis Ababa. 



Comments are closed.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.