Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

April 22nd, 2013

4/22/2013

 
David

While I think we all appreciate the call for increased attention to global inequalities, I do think that you slightly simplify the 'complacent world-view', and I don't think that this helps advocacy. Much of the rich debate that the Broker hosted was actually about whether inequality should be
added as goal beyond the current MDGs, including the one on poverty. There is a lot wrong with the current MDG framework, but it would be unfair to argue that 'growth' is still the predominant paradigm (or to ignore the role of the UN) - and if anything emerging economies particularly China (and changing politics in countries of 'like-minded donors' perhaps) have been most vocal to bring growth back on the agenda, even if this retains a critical role of the state.

Before we throw away the baby with the bathwater, it'd be good to consider the successes of the MDG framework of the aid industry, and under what conditions these have been achieved. Moreover, in the Broker debate, Martin Ravallion and  Stephan Klasen made very important points about the difficulty of using inequality as a measure. For me, the question is not whether inequality should be put on the agenda, but who would bring it on which agenda. Historically, inequalities have started to be addressed by social movements,  often under specific conditions where addressing inequality made sense for elites too and the nation as a whole (something we now I believe are witnessing in China for example). Except for support to social protection schemes, which play an important but small role for example in the declining inequality in
Latin America, the processes that address inequalities are quite different from the kind of transfers the aid industry has specialized in. 

It’d be worth re-reading Kasirim Nwuke’s reaction to the debate on social protection, on this same email network a few days back, where he emphasized the need for
citizens to reassert their voice, over a globally defined agenda.

Arjan de Haan
Supporting Inclusive Growth
International Development Research Centre Ottawa 

Comments are closed.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.