Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

February 06th, 2014

2/6/2014

 
Dear Stephen and Richard,

Thank you for your thoughts on our paper on the impact of Ghana's fuel subsidy reforms. As one of the authors, let me respond as the discussion has raised key points related to these kinds of research and advocacy.

First, in any country we must acknowledge that changes in poverty rates due to fuel subsidy reforms on the one hand and any social protection expansions on the other hand, are likely to represent different groups of people. In our paper, for example, we underline that we are estimating the changes in poverty incidence at the overall national level. This means that while the rise in the national poverty rate due to the subsidy removal and its equal decline due to the LEAP expansion cancel each other out in the national headcount figure, the people affected are clearly not the same - it is not a neat one-for-one trade-off and should never be suggested as such. We must be careful in our messaging not to present (often) small social protection programmes as some kind of compensation for such reforms.

Secondly, these days, following the 2011 revision of its Proxy Means Test, the LEAP programme is well targeted (the best targeted national transfer programme according to the 2010 targeting review by the World Bank - with almost 60% of benefits reaching the extreme poor alone, compared to 2.3% from fuel subsidies). The programme's recent independent evaluation (link below) shows important positive impacts on a range of both social and economic indicators.

The point that Richard highlights on cost comparison is central in many countries. And indeed in Ghana, the fuel subsidies would have cost over 1bn USD in 2013 whereas LEAP costs about 20m USD per year - so a huge difference. Unfortunately however, it has been rather a moot point here in Ghana as the fiscal deficit stood at almost 12% by the end of 2013, long after subsidies where removed. The fiscal crunch in Ghana led the government to immediately look for spending cuts and fuel subsidies were an unavoidable target. This is why it was even more important to successfully advocate for a continued expansion of LEAP rather than a stagnation or cut backs. It has been encouraging that political leaders so strongly back the programme and that the Government continues to fund the majority of its costs.

Best regards,
Sarah

http://www.unicef.org/ghana/resources_7764.html

_______________________
Sarah Hague
Chief of Social Policy/ACMA
UNICEF Ghana
Tel office: (+233) (0)302 772524 or 773583, Ext 1237
Tel mob: (+233) (0)245 352977
http://www.unicef.org/ghana


Comments are closed.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.