Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

February 07th, 2014

2/7/2014

 
Dear Sarah,

Thanks for this. But, it does seem that millions of people ended up with lower incomes in Ghana as a result of fuel subsidy reform, but only around 75,000 households received some compensation. This does not suggest to me that LEAP’s tiny expansion can have had much impact at all.

It’s interesting to hear that the Proxy Means Test produced good targeting. I’ve done a lot of research on the PMT and the methodology has very significant inherent design errors, which produce - when targeted at the 2.5% of households living in the most extreme poverty - exclusion errors of around 80-90% (when assessed against coverage of those 2.5%). In fact, we showed that the PMT as entirely inappropriate when targeting such a small proportion of the population.  I’ve attached a paper we did on the PMT to explain the methodology so that you can see how problematic it is (and there’s also a link below to a short paper summarising it by Nick Freeland). At best, the PMT is a reasonably effective rationing mechanism, but no more than that. It’s certainly not effective at targeting: the target is missed more often than it is hit. I also provide a link to a recent paper I did on "Rethinking targeting" which argues that coverage is the most important means of increasing the inclusive of families living in poverty: LEAP fails badly on this.

http://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/resource-centre/pathways-perspectives/post/98-pathways--perspectives-11

http://www.wahenga.net/node/2043

It seems that the results on targeting effectiveness from the World Bank are from 2010, but the PMT was not yet functioning then (or was it?). So, presumably these results were only theoretical. Has there been any subsequent empirical assessment? It would be great if you could share the 2010 targeting review.

However, I’d agree with Gaspar that means testing is very much part of the problem (and, of course the proxy means test is much less effective than a means test, although it can be a lot cheaper to do). The Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates the Right to Social Security for all children. LEAP - and PMTs - are not the way to guarantee this right. UNICEF’s work in Nepal to promote a universal child benefit seems much more promising.

Best,

Stephen KiddSenior Social Policy Specialist
Development Pathways, UK


Comments are closed.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.