Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

February 08th, 2014

2/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Dear all,

I am in line with Guy and just want to share two experiences I have from the field (just to confirm or contrast some of the idea below). I have been working with WFP in assessing the advantages of cash versus food distribution in situations of food shortage in Malawi in 2 consecutive years. We found the following. Nutritional outcomes are roughly the same since people really spent the cash transfer on food but insome smaller markets where food supply in the lean season was insufficient we found important inflationary effects. Behind this fact we had a not properly implemented market assessment (a kind of food market stress test for selection villages for cash distribution). So we improved this stress test for the next year and things went better. So the point here is, yes, Guy is right, there are a lot of elasticities which are sufficiently strong for avoiding inflation but in some sensitive areas you have to be very careful because if inflation pops up the harm for poor can be severe.

The second experience is from Moldova where after are financial situation close to default in 2008 FMI argued with the government to end universal transfers (too expensive) and switch over to targeted means testing. This was done with WB support and ended up leaving important groups of people out (e.g. rural households with > 3 children under 10 years), just because the means testing was not able to identify them (basically because low household incomes are overestimated due to the model specification). We had through UNICEF a 2 years discussion with the Ministry of Family to go back to a mixed system, some parts means tested and some parts universal (for certain categories like the one I mentioned). Of course the Ministry was reluctant and argued they just changed the system because IMF and WB pushed for it and now UNICEF says the opposite.

Well, finally this means for me at least in practice on the ground a mixed system is the one, which best adapts to reality, something like the best fit in econometric models.

If anybody is interested in the assessment and evaluation reports from Malawi and Moldova, just send me an e-mail.

Thomas Otter
Director ECI – Gestión para el Desarrollo Humano
totter@ecidesarrollo.com
Www.ecidesarrollo.com

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.