Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

May 02nd, 2013

5/2/2013

 
Dear Duncan,

Any time‘reforms’ are carried out in a sweeping manner, with the same policies applied to very different countries, ignoring the historical and institutional make-up of the individual countries, there are going to be problems.  The
Washington Consensus lumped all countries together—not just the 20 very distinct countries within Latin America –but Asia, Africa (and now in its somewhat modified approach, Europe).

The“Consensus” was an ideological pursuit based on shaky theoretical grounds.  The empirical evidence revealed quite clearly that the ‘reforms’ were not for the common good, as unemployment, informality and poverty skyrocketed.  
But when these inconveniences  were pointed out, the common response of the supporters of the Washington
Consensus was to argue that the reforms hadn’t been instituted fully – that labour market “rigidities” were keeping the economy from adjusting, thus leading to unemployment. 

Chile is the emblematic case because its reforms were undertaken more than a decade before liberalization in many other Latin American countries and the post-1984 recovery and robust growth of the 1990s was taken as evidence of success.  The severe crises of the mid-1970s and early 1980s were glossed over as were the important lessons that could have been learned from when hasty, and
ideologically driven, liberalization are put in place.  But rather than noting that privatization led to emergence of large industrial conglomerates (the“grupos”), that the privatized pension system had sky-high administrative costs, that workers had no voice or bargaining power, that unemployment averaged 15% in Greater Santiago during the 1980s, that real wages did not recover their 1970 level until 1992, or that there was (and still is) a proliferation of short-term and precarious contracts in the labour market,
the IFIs stood silent – selling instead a slate of reforms.  

The Washington Consensus was doctrine and it was
doctrinaire, but unfortunately, in this current crisis, I don’t see that we have moved much past it.

Janine Berg
ILO (also writing in her personal capacity)
Sr. Development Economist Policy Integration Department
International Labour Office
4, route des Morillons
1211 Geneva Switzerland

Comments are closed.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.