Recovery with a Human Face
  • E-Discussion 2010-
  • About this e-discussion
  • Books
  • Recent Articles
  • Contact

Recovery with a Human Face

A discussion on alternatives for a socially-responsive crisis recovery
 

October 16th, 2014

10/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Dear colleagues, 

As you know, September 2014 saw the opening of the new session of the UN General Assembly, with special days devoted to climate change and to the MDGs and SDGs. The deliberations on the next “development” agenda resume in earnest in January, and are to conclude with a new agenda by mid-September 2015.

2015 will also have other hopefully milestone, transformative conferences:
  • on women – marking 20 years since the path-breaking Beijing Conference (New York, March 2015);
  • on finance for development – hopefully leading to claimable decisions on generating genuinely additional ODA and progressive, equitable tax reform (Addis, July 2015); and
  • on climate change – hopefully getting commitments from the world’s  largest polluters to turn to sustainable – liveable – production and consumption patterns (Paris, November-December 2015).

Interestingly, the High-level panel of experts invited to advise UN SG Ban Ki Moon recently issued an open letter updating its report of last year (see http://gracamacheltrust.org/new/images/downloads/HLP_open_letter_FINAL.pdf). The letter stresses the role of business in achieving the agenda, once again illustrating the international bias towards the private sector – the role of the state is not considered, and the limitations of the capitalist economic rationale for fostering transformation are idealised.

And: women, children and civil society do not feature in the letter. When even the Nobel Prize Committee recognises the importance of women’s and rights, by according prizes to child and girl child rights activists, this is surprising, to say the least.

The next eleven months will show whether multilateralism can become visionary, as it once was, long ago, or is becoming irrelevant. But we worry not for multilateralism per se, but for the role it ought to be playing for social, economic and environmental justice, for fundamental human rights, and concretely for the rights of women and of the next generation.

Regards.

Gabriele Köhler
Development Economist,
UNRISD Senior Research Associate

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    This e-discussion is ongoing by email Apologies if late updates on this website...


    Moderator
    

    Isabel Ortiz
    Director Social Protection ILO

    Picture
    Follow on Twitter 
    To join this e-discussion, send an email to: sympa@socpro.list.ilo.org
    with SUBSCRIBE recoveryhumanface in the subject 

    Archives

    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All


    This e-discussion is intended to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to
    stimulate discussion; 
    the interpretations and p
    ositions expressed by contributors do not reflect the policies of ILO. 

    “We, the Peoples” are the first words of the UN Charter. The UN was founded in 1945 and
    mandated to respond to the needs and rights of all persons, in every country of the world. In this spirit of social justice, a real world recovery means a recovery for all
    persons, not simply the recovery of a few economic indicators and
    companies.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.